Out of curiousity I just took the SelectSmart 2004 Presidential Selector. It’s not bad, although not that informational. It certainly could be made much better by specifically gridding out the issues, allowing something akin to a +/-5 type thing, and being interactive so you could pop up each candidates stance and see how they reflect to your opinions. That being said, it at least has some semblance of accuracy. It put me as most closely matched to Dean. By comparison, Bush was at 7%.
random($foo) is the occassionally still updated blog of Leonard Lin. My pics are on Flickr, code is on Github. @lhl on Twitter. More »