just reading through an older napster article on oreillynet. interesting point is about napster unchaining use of independent namespaces. interesting. oreillynet also has a good article on freenet and gnutella. i looked through both the protocol specs this weekend, but wasn’t able to find specifications for describing a folder hierarchy. this seems pretty strange to me. this would be one of the things that i would really like to see…

yet another moronic patent. you can read the esteemed patents officer director’s comments in a recent catfight w/ tim o’reilly. that guy is quite obviously a moron. actual quote: “The accessibility of that software is going to be able to be gotten a lot sooner if you patent it rather than copyright it.” this of course is moronic because while copyrights cover the original work, patents cover the concept, even if you come up with it on your own, even if you don’t know that it’s patented. that’s bs.

some more comments from tim o’reilly.

“The architecture of the Internet, as it is right now,” writes Lawrence Lessig, a constitutional scholar at Harvard University, “is perhaps the most important model of free speech since the founding [of the American republic]. This model has implications far beyond e-mail and Web pages. Two hundred years after the framers ratified the Constitution, the Net has taught us what the First Amendment means. If we take this meaning seriously, then the First Amendment will require a fairly radical restructuring of the architectures of speech off the Net as well.” read the rest

jeez, my life is pretty pathetic right now. wake up, go to work, get back, waste a few hours somehow, go to sleep. repeat. grrr…

one cool thing that i’m doing is re-ripping my cds with LAME. i’m going at about 2 per day. one in the morning, one at night.