from /.: Alien54 writes: “As reported in CNN, a hi-tech shanty town has arisen in Madrid, Spain, complete with pirated utilities and computer access. Known locally as El Campamento de Esperanza (The Camp of Hope), it is now a village of about 1,200 inhabitants, with libraries, bars, hot showers and cafeterias serving daily meals. They are skilled engineers and technicians, formerly employed by Sintel Telecommunications, a Spanish telecom company that filed for bankruptcy protection in 2000. With a mixture of ingenuity and tenacity, the workers have transformed their claim to $10 million in unpaid wages and refusal to accept forced resignations into a national issue, by squatting on the property where they used to work.” Such a thing could never exist in the U.S. for longer than it took to load up the tear gas grenade launchers.

i’ve been reading “enter the zone,” written by dr barry sears, phd, and while its appealingly written, a quick calculation of the amount of protein i need (lean body mass * activity coefficient) and then multiplying out the 30%-40%-30% protien, carbs, fat ratio gives me a daily caloric intake of between 1060 and 1200 calories depending on the activitiy coefficient i use. this is extremely calorie restricted diet. i was maintaining my weight at 2100-2300 calories/day. now, what i want to ask is, great, this thing works great if you want to lose weight, but how the heck is it maintainable? what happens when you want to maintain your body fat %? where’s the caloric deficit going to go? does your bmr magically drop down? anyway, i’ve been doing a lot of reading recently trying to find some scientific evidence either way, but it’s been tough going. a lot of anectdotal stuff and all that. i wanna see studies! anyway, some interesting things i’ve come across:

“Although the 40-30-30 balance is fairly healthy, the 800 to 1,200 calories allowed daily aren’t,” says Susan Roberts, Ph.D., professor of nutrition at Tufts University in Boston. “That’s in addition to the fact that no such zone exists.”

tons of pro/con-zone articles and sites excluded for brevity. for those of you w/ extra time and lack of anything to do with it, like me, check out the scientific american ask the experts in medicine page. it has some really neat stuff.