Matt’s put up a great article on his experience with Adsense and his PVRblog entitled Blogging for Dollars

Also, Cam posts about being on the campaign trail, working on Wes Clark’s blog. (I like Wes Clark, the TPM interview was great; but if asked right now, I’d still being voting Dean – and yes, I was having a conversation where it came up; you know it’s bad when of a retired General seems like a more reasonable choice than the incumbent)

Seb keeps a blog with pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing and scholarly communication. Here’s a recent followup to a Richard MacManus piece asking: why would normal people want to publish to the Web?

MacManus writes:

While I agree wholeheartily with the sentiments expressed by John and others
like Phil Wolff, I wonder how
practical it is to expect business people to write k-logs. It’s all very well having
tools like k-collector to aggregate Intranet
content, but the real issue is how do we get people to create the
content
in the first place? Interestingly, this is the exact same problem
the Semantic Web has getting off the ground, people currently aren’t writing
enough metadata to make the Semantic Web happen.

Seb elaborates:

Accurate observations in there. I honestly believe blogging as we
currently know it will never become mainstream. The reason is that it
is a poor fit for anyone who isn’t the (hyper)text-driven, infovore kind of
person.

However, that doesn’t mean that the more general practice of broadcasting information of personal relevance will not become mainstream. My vision of the future in this respect is closest to what Marc Canter.s been pushing under the moniker of .digital lifestyle aggregator.; this also seems to be where Meg Hourihan is heading with the Lafayette project.

Think about restaurant/show reviews, recipes, pictures. The Web is
already full of user-contributed stuff like that; most of it currently
resides on centralized sites like
Amazon. The individuals who help build those sites do so most of the
time with no reward other than a high local profile that is generally non-transferable
(how many Amazon reviewers are on your blogroll?). I.m willing to bet
that many of them would prefer keeping control over their contributions
and putting themselves at the center of their content if systems were available that made that easy.

Just got around to reading Dell’s Dud, John Gruber’s a very interesting analysis on how the Dell DJ and the Apple iPod.

But the iPod is not merely an engineering and usability success. It’s also a marketing success. Everyone knows what an iPod is, and what it does. And everyone knows that they’re cool.

Andy Warhol said:

What’s great about this country is that America started the tradition
where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the
poorest. You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you can know
that the president drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke and, just think,
you can drink Coke too. A Coke is a Coke, and no amount of money can
get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking.
All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good. Liz Taylor knows
it, the president knows it, the bum knows it, and you know it.

The iPod is the Coca-Cola of music players. It’s not an expensive
computer peripheral – it’s a low-cost luxury item. For $500, anyone can
buy the best MP3 player in the world, the same one used by the world.s
most famous, most talented music stars . like Moby, Beck, and Shaq.